HomeEconomyThe Court of Auditors considers the results of the detection of French...

The Court of Auditors considers the results of the detection of French SMEs in difficulty to be “disappointing”

Since 2020, the State has put in place two systems to detect and assist bankrupt companies: the “universal entry point” and the “weak signals”. An effort deemed “disappointing” by the Court of Auditors.

The system for detecting and dealing with SMEs in crisis is “adequate” in France, but its results are “disappointing”, the Court of Auditors said in a report published on Friday.

He points out that these companies with fewer than 250 employees “represent the majority of the French productive fabric with 99% of companies, 49% of employees and 40% of added value”, and that the expiration of the support measures implemented during Covid “reinforced the challenge of quickly detecting their difficulties”. Currently, business bankruptcies are exceeding their pre-Covid level.

Detecting and helping SMEs in difficulty

There are two networks to address these issues, emanating from two different directorates of the Ministry of Economy, the Directorate General of Public Finance (DGFiP) and the Directorate General of Enterprises (DGE), while the Ministry of Labour and Urssaf also propose solutions, such as regional councils, commercial courts, chambers of commerce and associative structures.

In 2021, the State launched the “universal entry point” to help these companies navigate, through “departmental crisis exit advisors”, located in the departmental directorates of public finances (DDFiP). The digital project “Weak Signals” also allows the administration to detect risks of failure.

But this system, which is both “plentiful” and “fragmented,” according to the Court, has a “disappointing” track record at this stage. Indeed, businesses and other stakeholders still have difficulty identifying the departmental adviser; they “rarely” respond when management contacts them through “weak signals.” Departmental advisers do not “sufficiently” direct business leaders to the right structures and tools.

A “thorough evaluation” is required

The Court notes that the procedures for handling the debt are “multiple” – disclosure of payments to public creditors, loans, audits, credit mediation, amicable procedures, support for entrepreneurs, etc. – with different impacts and little known to the public.

Using his own figures, he found that one-year survival rates for companies varied widely depending on the procedure, from 72% following an amicable procedure to 86% in the case of a rescheduling of tax and social security debts.

The report recommends, in particular, local collaboration agreements for a smoother “user journey”, or that DGFiP and Urssaf systematically inform business leaders about support solutions in the event of non-payment of taxes or contributions. It also calls for “an in-depth evaluation” of the effectiveness of the procedures by the services concerned.

Author: PA with AFP
Source: BFM TV

Stay Connected
16,985FansLike
2,458FollowersFollow
61,453SubscribersSubscribe
Must Read
Related News

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here