Be careful with parliamentary headaches on the agricultural bill. The text, which has already been the subject of a unique tactical maneuver of the central block this Monday, May 26, is now the origin of a motion of censure.
Insumise France, who had already announced his deposit, intends to take action this Wednesday, before an examination of the agreement in the assembly “next week,” says Mathilde Panot, head of the deputies of the movement, at BFMTV-RMC this Wednesday, May 28.
“We send it to the various deputies of the left groups so they can sign it,” he said.
The rebel denounces a “blow of strength”, while LFI opposed this bill. In question: the adoption of a motion of rejection in the initiative of the central block, which however supported the bill.
According to this tactic, the deputies directly returned the text to a joint joint commission (CMP). This body that brings together seven deputies and seven senators will have to agree on a common version, from the version already adopted in the Senate.
“49.3 disguised”
The authors of the maneuver defend themselves from having wanted to ignore the Parliament, returning responsibility for the rebels and environmentalists, to those who criticize a “mass obstruction strategy”, the latter has deposited respectively 1,500 and 800 amendments in almost 3,500 in total.
A “49.3 disguised”, had on Monday Mathilde Panot Insurgent, in reference to this constitutional article that allows the Government to approve a text in the National Assembly without the vote of the deputies.
With the support of the Fensea, which had requested the mobilization for the occasion, the agricultural law, known as a dupil in reference to its author, Senator LR Laurent Dupomb, notes in particular to reintroduce, as a derogatory, as a derogatory, Acetamipride.
Or a pesticide of the neonicotinoid family in France has been banned since 2018. Its effects on humans are concerned, even if these risks remain uncertain, due to lack of scale.
Authorized in another part of Europe, beet or hazelnut producers claim it significantly, who believe they have no other solution against pests. On the contrary, it is criticized by environmental defenders, beekeepers and the peasant confederation (third agricultural union) that call it “bees murderer.”
Source: BFM TV
