Marine Le Pen says that he is in favor of a debate in the Parliament on DUPLO LAW, but denounces “the propaganda of the left”

Marine Le Pen said Monday, July 21, in favor of the celebration of a debate in the Parliament on the Agricultural Law of Dupomb, against which a petition gathered at this stage more than 1.3 million signatures. While denouncing “the propaganda of the left” on the subject.

“Even if we deplore the lies that accompany the current request, we completely maintain a parliamentary debate on DUPLO LAW,” wrote the leader of the national demonstration in X.

“We refuse that the propaganda of the left can allow our compatriots to imagine that this law threatens their health and our environment,” he said.

Before adding: “The French expect serious and clear answers: if a pesticide is dangerous, it must be prohibited and the imports that use it should not enter France; if it is not dangerous, then it can be used.”

A law approved by Marine Le Pen

“It is out of discussion to suggest that people’s health would be a variable of economic adjustment of the main private interests,” Marine Le Pen still wrote “,” past health scandals in which collusion among some politicians, managers of health authorities and lobbies have sabotado the confidence of citizens. “

“Only a transparent and decent democratic debate can hardly restore” the “trust” of citizens, he said.

The double law, which provides in particular the reintroduction in a dismissal and under conditions of a pesticide of the neonicotinoid family, was adopted by Parliament on July 8 with the votes of the deputies of the national demonstration, including Marine Le Pen.

Previously, RN deputies had also voted for the previous rejection motion presented by the supporters of the law to avoid the numerous amendments deposited by the left, accusing the latter of wanting to block the debates.

The Presidents Conference of the National Assembly, which sets the agenda, can decide at the beginning of the school year organize a debate in the public session on the request launched on July 10 and demand the repeal of the double. However, this debate would not allow a reexamal of the law on substance, which would require a new legislative text.