Instead of one, the PGR receives six reports from the TAP investigative committee. One with the socialist version worked out by Congresswoman Ana Paula Bernardo – it will hardly include the opposition’s proposals; another, in the form of an explanation of vote, from the PSD; a third of IL along the same lines; a fourth BE report, in case the PS does not fully adopt the blockers’ proposed amendments – which seems very predictable; one fifth of the PCP can be delivered, exactly for the same reasons as the BE, but the party is still evaluating; and a sixth from Chega that speaks of “political, deliberate and deliberate interference” by the government in TAP.

The PSD will not present proposals for changes to the PS version like the IL, preferring to include its own conclusions in the format of the explanation of vote that will be attached to the final report.

“Given the contents of the report, its serious omissions, the debt reduction and the position of the government and the PS, the PSD Group not only intends to vote against, but also presents a series of conclusions, in writing, which will be published and forms an integral part of the report”, revealed yesterday afternoon the coordinator of the PSD in the parliamentary committee, Paulo Moniz.

While what exists is one “partisan mitigation of government responsibilities in the administration of TAPthe PSD reminds that “the report is light and partial and it is very helpful António Costa because we know that apparently he would never sign and will never draw any political consequences”.

In the case of BE, which was “sparing” with proposals, as Pedro Filipe Soares, parliamentary leader, said, it does not suggest a “structural change of the document” but the “solution of structural omissions that the document has and what the would be truth if they were maintained (…) If the aim is to arrive at the truth, they can only be accepted”.

“It is unacceptable that part of the work of the commission is omitted from the report and therefore also something to do with the behavior, with João Galamba’s board at the head of the Ministry of Infrastructure, should be included in the CPI report. mentioned (…) which symbolizes the promiscuity between the party and the public interest, the meeting of the PS faction with the CEO of TAP is illustrative of this. Not acceptable and cannot be removed from the report”, he underlined.

Since the BE does not accept “that 2023 be withdrawn” from the CPI [em causa a gestão de Galamba] an explanation of vote with all the bloquista conclusions puts an end to the “whitewashing” of the socialists. For its part, the PCP argues that the 46 proposed amendments allow “a series of serious omissions, untruths and untruthsIf the PS accepts it (which is unlikely) the communists will vote for the final document, otherwise they will follow the same path as the explanation of vote.

“Now there is a huge road from the current text to the text as it should be (…) At the moment the report is bad and we have until Thursday [amanhã] at the end of the day to solve this problem,” said Bruno Dias.

The IL that will not submit amendments to refuse “participating in farces”, in a “work of fiction that contradicts reality and what the Portuguese know”, “obviously” will solve “political interference”, “lies and lack of transparency” in an explanation of vote.

Enough for those who want to put forward proposals for amendments It is clear that the political interference during Costa’s administration was wanted, deliberate and deliberateand that “there are three major government officials responsible for it”, former minister Pedro Nuno Santos, João Galamba and former secretary of state for infrastructure, Hugo Mendes, who cannot ignore Fernando Medina, says André Ventura.

The preliminary report (PS) argues that “there are no material situations that indicate a practice of interference in the day-to-day management of the company by the guardianships” and that “most testimonials point to the lack of interference or political interference by the guardianships in the day-to-day management of Company”.

Changes?

PS

The Socialists are tabling six amendments to the report. Of these, they propose that government managers should disclose to the entity where they begin their position the compensation they received in previous positions under the government manager’s statute. In addition, the PS argues that in the chapter on the appointment of Alexandra Reis to the NAV it should be added that “Alexandra Reis, upon her return to the exercise of public functions, did not repay the part of the remuneration provided for” in the status of public administrator.

psd

The Social Democrats did not come up with amendments, but with their own conclusions. At a press conference, Deputy Paulo Moniz said the “report is light and partial.” Therefore, the conclusions of the PSD will be presented as an explanation of vote that will be attached to the final report. Among these conclusions, the PSD states that there is no doubt that the government interfered in the management of the company, especially “when it asked to divert a flight from the President of the Republic” or when “they TAP to sought clarification and was a member of the government that coordinated this response”.

He’s coming

Chega, in turn, proposes that the final report include evidence of government interference, including the prime minister, in the airline. The party argues that this interference “was done, desired, intentional and knowing”.

PCP

The communists focused on running the business and left the business aside. Taking this into account, they suggest that, among other issues – and given what the CPI has gathered in the making – the government should halt the company’s privatization process and take responsibility for TAP.

ARE

The blockers come up with about 30 changes. The main highlight is the proposal to create a new section, focused on the events of the Ministry of Infrastructure, on April 26, between Frederico Pinheiro, former deputy, and members of the Cabinet of the Minister, João Galamba.