Emmanuel Macron said on Wednesday, July 23 that he would wait for the decision of the Constitutional Council on the Duplo law before expressing himself before the request asking for his repeal, while calling for “science” and “competition” in environmental matters, he informed the government spokesman.
During the Council of Ministers, the Head of State confirmed that he wanted to “respect the institutional time” and, therefore, that “he will wait for the conclusions of the Constitutional Council,” that he will decide before August 10, Sophie Primas Primas said to the press.
“We often listen to somewhat simplistic things”
“He recalled that our political action, whatever, even in these agricultural issues, must be guided by science in particular and that at the same time we must defend our farmers” to only compete, “he added.
“Everything that detracts us from” in relation to the rules in force in other countries “Penalizes us,” said Emmanuel Macron, according to her. “It is very attentive to this path of the crest,” said the spokesman.
At the end of the Council of Ministers, the president deplored “often listening to somewhat simplistic things” about Dute Law, we learned from concordant sources that confirmed the Parisians. A way for the Head of State to support the law indirectly, estimate two participants.
A petition with record signatures
Almost 1.8 million citizens, a record, signed a petition at the site of the National Assembly against the Dupomb Law, which is highly criticized for its environmental impact. This could lead to a debate, without vote, to this law already adopted by Parliament. But several leftist parties and environmental associations ask the President of the Republic to demand a “new deliberation” of the text in Parliament, as authorized by the Constitution.
The law of Senator Les Républicins Laurent Dupumb, adopted on July 8, particularly authorizes the reintroduction subject to acetamipride, a pesticide forbidden in France but authorized in other places in Europe. This product, toxic to biodiversity and potentially for human health, is claimed by beet or hazelnut producers, who believe they have no alternatives against pests and suffer an unfair competition of foreign producers.
Source: BFM TV
