What future for music in the face of generative artificial intelligence? The question is in this stage insoluble, while the music industry seeks to protect from abuse. On the side of the elders, some have filed complaints, for example, Universal Music Group and Sony Music, who attacked Suno, who, according to them, allows them to “copy” their catalog.
The artists themselves have long wanted to strengthen the rules in terms of creating and protection of music against the development of AI.
Anyone can create a blow
But not all labels are of the same opinion. As Associated Press explains, one of them, Hallwood Media, has just signed with an artist who has, for his own admission, “without musical talent.”
This does not prevent him from being someone very prolific in many musical styles. Better known as Imoliver, offers songs that respond to many genres, from the country to rap, through electro and indie-pop.
At the origin of the visual designer, he saw in AI a means of “giving vision to some (their). The public is there: one of his songs, Stone, exceeded 3 million listeners. The fact is that nothing prevents fans from being an artificial intelligence: the credits of the song present on the platforms are happy to point out that Oliver McCann is “author” and “composer”.
A sincerity problem that certain transmission platforms seek Stem. This is the case of French Deezer, Competitor of Spotify, which developed a robot detecting the titles generated by AI. This makes it possible to be defeat and eliminate monetization.
In recent months, the songs generated by AI have been increasingly numerous on the platforms, particularly thanks to the progress of generators such as Suno, which allow it to create a piece, simply with a prayer, or notice, stipulating a style. You can also add letters to create a voice from scratch. Recently, the Velvet Sundown group, heard by hundreds of thousands of users, revealed to use.
Source: BFM TV
