The PS proposes that the inquiry commission’s report to TAP recommends that government managers should disclose to the entity where they begin their position the compensation they received in previous positions under the government manager’s statute.
The PS presented six proposals to amend the preliminary report of the Commission of Inquiry, presented last week by the deputy socialist rapporteur, Ana Paula Bernardo, in a document accessed this Tuesday by the Lusa bureau, proposing minor changes.
One of the goals of the PS is to add an amendment to the recommendations to “ensure the effective control of financial legality” in public business, establishing public managers at the beginning of their functions under the Statute of the public manager, “the duty of disclosure to a public body of all amounts received in compensation for termination of management or management positions in other entities under the same statute”.
“Listed companies are under an obligation to disclose to a public body all amounts paid as compensation for termination of management or management positions under the same status,” he adds.
The Socialists also want a conclusion to be added to clarify that “it has been shown that the sectoral trusteeship did not prevent the company from cooperating with the financial trusteeship”.
In the chapter of the report on the appointment process of Alexandra Reis to the board of directors of NAV, the socialists want to add that “on her return to public office, with her appointment as chairman of the board of directors of NAV four months later, Alexandra Reis did not return the part of the fee provided for” in the statute of the public trustee.
“From what this parliamentary committee of inquiry has found, it appears that no government agency has found non-compliance with the return of the part of the remuneration provided for in the terms of the state manager’s statute,” he proposes to add.
Already in the first chapter of the report, the PS wants to add that it is not explicit “whose ultimate responsibility is to ensure that the management contracts are concluded” since “there is no control mechanism that guarantees the effectiveness of the law, namely, to comply with the legal deadline”.
Source: DN
